The Myth of “Full-Timers” in Trade Unions
In Sri Lanka’s Labour movement, the term “full-timer” has become a source of confusion and manipulation. Some trade unions attempt to convince members that only elected branch leaders qualify as “full-time” representatives, while ordinary workers are relegated to “part-time” status. This claim, however, has no foundation in law. It is a manufactured narrative that undermines worker solidarity and misrepresents the protections guaranteed under Sri Lankan legislation.
The
Trade Unions Ordinance is clear in its scope: it governs the
registration, regulation, and functioning of unions. It defines officers,
executives, and members, but nowhere does it create categories of “full-time”
or “part-time” unionists. Its purpose is to ensure unions are legally
recognized and their officers can represent workers collectively—not to
determine employment status.
Meanwhile,
the Shop and Office Employees (Regulation of Employment and Remuneration)
Act directly regulates employment relationships. It requires employers to
issue appointment letters, set working hours, and guarantee minimum standards
of pay and welfare. Under this Act, any worker continuously employed is
recognized as a full employee with statutory rights. Whether or not they hold a
union office has no bearing on their employment status.
The
problem arises when unions blur these two frameworks. By suggesting that only
elected leaders are “full-timers,” they create a false hierarchy that
diminishes the legitimacy of ordinary members. In reality, all employees
covered under the Shop and Office Employees Act are full-time workers if they
meet the conditions of continuous employment. Union officers may be recognized
under the Trade Unions Ordinance, but that recognition does not translate into
a special employment category.
This
distinction is crucial. Workers who are denied appointment letters or misled
about their status risk losing out on protections guaranteed by law. Awareness
is the first step: employment rights are defined by Labour legislation, not by
internal union politics. Trade unions should strengthen worker solidarity by
clarifying these legal realities, not by inventing categories that divide their
membership.
The bottom line: Sri Lankan law does not restrict “full-timer” status to
union branch leaders. Workers under the Shop and Office Employees Act are
legally recognized employees with full rights, regardless of union narratives.
It is time for unions to stop perpetuating myths and start empowering members
with the truth.
Dilakson. S
Comments
Post a Comment